Wednesday 4 July 2012

Two sides to a story

Did more research.

Wrote to Subordinate Courts. This was the answer "We regret to inform that your application is not approved as the case is still ongoing and not concluded". Huh ?? 

Wrote email to Mr Ho (CAD) and Mr Kelvin (

This was the reply, "Currently the matter is in Court and we are at the discovery stage, where the defence counsel and the public prosecutor are exchanging information. The next mention of the case is fixed on  3 July 2012."

Unfortunately, not very sure, but heard case was extended again.
So fed up ! Wrote to PP's lawyer. It seems to us, from a document dated 29 May 12, the charges on PG's directors reduce to 18 cases, amount to US$ 732, 000.


ChargeNumber
ClientName
Amount (US$)
1
Duraiarajan s/o Duraiappan Mariyammal
 $         20,000.00
2
Au Chung Wai Christopher
 $         54,000.00
3
Arijit Chakraborty
 $         10,000.00
4
Koh Leong Tuan Alan
 $         59,000.00
5
Leong Pek Kay
 $         15,000.00
6
Lim Shi An
 $         26,000.00
7
Ng Ee Ling
 $         20,000.00
8
Chua Pair Shen
 $           5,000.00
9
Yap Lay Hong Lilian
 $       186,000.00
10
Adsit Serena Kim
 $           5,000.00
11
Mellisa Octaviani
 $         13,000.00
12
Foo Siew Wei
 $           5,000.00
13
Lium Ming Toon
 $         90,000.00
15
John Nicholas Williams
 $         10,000.00
17
Neoh Kok Cheng
 $       191,000.00
18
Annamalai Meyyappan
 $           7,000.00
19
Peter Aloysius Lourdes
 $           6,000.00
20
Tan ZheQi
 $         10,000.00


 $       732,000.00


Hello, can we talk logic here ?

Who in the right mind, took so much effort to run a multi-national business to cheat these18 customers (out of 3000++ cusomters world-wide) ??

To our horror, we know some of them, their investment are not in "BORON". Huh ??

Reading the recent "Cheat" case on City Harvest, cant help to think that "there must have 2 sides to a story"

We think, CAD need to state clearly their definition of "cheat"

Next, there should be clear policy and governance process defined, else innovative or creative approach could be termed as "cheat"

Finally,  it might well be a perspective issue. Whatever the case, "PG" or Paster Kong, they should be given a fair ground to defence. Whatever evidence against them and supporting information should be given to the defender. This will help in gaining clarity.
There is definitely another side of the story that we need to discover. We need to move the case ourselves since PG is struck now.

 If your names are listed and you did not invest in "BORON" , could you send us an email to iwantjusticeandintegrity@gmail.com

No comments: